C - Re: ½Ð°Ý¦p¦ó¥Îc»y¨¥¼g¤@µ{¦¡

You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author

Re: ½Ð°Ý¦p¦ó¥Îc»y¨¥¼g¤@µ{¦¡

Malcolm

2004-04-30, 3:20 pm

"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> On the contrary, it is a proper detection of correct operation of
> the sscanf call, preserving the results for possible diagnostics,
> and allowing continuation (in an else clause) whith the knowledge
> of success.
>
There's still a bug in it (in combination with the previous expression). Can
you spot it?

Sponsored Links