For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Java Help > May 2006 > Did the naming and bundling conventions change for J2EE SDK downloads from Sun ?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Did the naming and bundling conventions change for J2EE SDK downloads from Sun ?
Tom Parson

2006-05-22, 4:17 am

I remember times a couple of month ago when the current J2EE SDK was named by Sun
as e.g.

j2eesdk-1_4_02_2005Q2-windows.exe (where Q2 indicates the release from the 2nd quarter)

They were bundled WITHOUT an AppServer.

When I go now to Sun's web site I can see only one

J2EE 1.4 SDK with NO release quarter/year name postfix AND with Suns AppServer included.

Is there a change in naming and bundling strategy by Sun ?
Or am I on the wrong download page (I am currently only interested on the 1.4.xx release)?

What does the postfix "FCS" mean? Is this the standard J2EE SDK bundle or are
there other non-FCS J2EE SDKs as well?

What if I want to develop J2EE applications for JBoss AppServer:
Is there a J2EE SDK version without Suns AppServer or how do I switch
internal settings to JBoss?


Tom

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com