Home > Archive > PERL Miscellaneous > June 2007 > Re: FAQ 1.6 What is perl6?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: FAQ 1.6 What is perl6?
|
|
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-22, 7:04 pm |
| Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
>
>
> Purl> Now hold on there just a minute! A few days back some of the
> childish Purl> False Gods of Perl around here were screaming their
> heads off about, Purl> "not reinventing the wheel."
>
> Purl> I'll be damn, there is Larry Wall confessing to "reinventing
> the wheel."
>
> I've never told people not to reinvent the wheel, if I was absolutely
> sure they were completely familiar with the wheel they were
> reinventing.
>
> In this case, I'm pretty sure that Larry is familiar with the wheel
> he is reinventing. Heck, he invented most of it in the first place.
>
> Put your "wand of unjustified comparisons" back in its sheath.
I have have to sort of agree with "Purl" on this one, some what. I have
seen soem regualars reepatedly tell people not to reinvent whats already
good and working and accepted. Even if the OP who posted the reinvention
did a decent job, theres usually aready to way theres already a way to
do it thats generally accepted.
But, Larry Wall's own words do seem to add a hint of contradicting to
soem of the preachings. Yes, it good to use what's workign well and
accepted and I suport that notion, but if that were always the case,
then there wouldn't be a Perl6 in the works :)
--
CL
| |
| Tad McClellan 2007-06-22, 10:04 pm |
| Clenna Lumina <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have
> seen soem regualars reepatedly tell people not to reinvent whats already
> good and working and accepted.
Like acceptable spelling.
If some famous Perl guy would of jsut implemented a spell-correcting 'bot,
then things would of been a lot better around here...
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.noitatibaher\100cmdat/"
| |
| Purl Gurl 2007-06-23, 8:03 am |
| Clenna Lumina wrote:
> Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
(snipped)
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
> I have have to sort of agree with "Purl" on this one, some what. I have
> seen soem regualars reepatedly tell people not to reinvent whats already
> good and working and accepted. Even if the OP who posted the reinvention
> did a decent job, theres usually aready to way theres already a way to
> do it thats generally accepted.
> But, Larry Wall's own words do seem to add a hint of contradicting to
> soem of the preachings. Yes, it good to use what's workign well and
> accepted and I suport that notion, but if that were always the case,
> then there wouldn't be a Perl6 in the works :)
I will add a courtesy note, Randal is not opposed to reinvention.
Most likely Randal thinks of this as I do, simply developing better
and more efficient methods for any given task.
On Perl 6, my personal opinion is this project is the greatest
historical blunder for Perl's history. Seven years into this
and no closer to being released. Once released, Perl 6 will prove
to be very unpopular. My opinion is Perl 6 porters have wasted
seven years of effort. Their efforts would be better invested
by turning Perl 5 into a lean and mean machine. Perl 6 is already
vaporware; technological advances and consumer needs have already
surpassed what Perl 6 can provide. Perl 6 is a dinosaur.
This preaching about not reinventing the wheel is a result of
mindless peer group pressure. Modules are hot! You MUST use
modules, always, even when not needed. Some of this is many
simply do not know how write code free of modules. Some of
this is "use a module" is a quick answer and a lazy way out
of investing effort into coding; a lack of pride.
Here is an example of how these mindless minions think.
Perl core contains a declaration. This is the "our" declaration
for global variables. This declaration is to fix the broken
strict module. Crazy, yes? Writing perl core to repair a
broken module is inane. Years back, "our" was well accepted
and suggested. Over time, Perl code writers became more lazy
and started using "my" declarations for globals. This is, of
course, incorrect syntax, bad syntax. Nonetheless, discussion
group minions began a campaign of, "you must use 'my' for
every single variable, global or not." This caught on, people
like this idea of less work, less effort, what the heck, let's
declare globals with "my" and forget about "our" declarations.
Use of "our" declarations was useless to begin with, served
no good purpose. Today, nobody makes use of "our" and almost
everyone says, "Never use an our declaration!" End effect
is this "our" declaration is even more useless, if such a
notion could be; perl core contains a worthless function.
Peer group pressure, popularity and an ample amount of
mindless "monkey see, monkey do" thinking leads to these
hypocritical notions we read, Clenna.
People scream at you, "Don't reinvent the wheel!" Larry Wall
declares, "We are reinventing the wheel." However, none object
to this obvious hypocrisy. This "don't reinvent" only applies
when a person sees a chance to seize an opportunity to masturbate
his ego through "yelling" at someone for "reinventing" which
is nothing more than control freak idiocy. None know why you
are not to reinvent the wheel, but all scream to not do this.
"Don't use globals! Don't use an our declaration!" None know
why, no thinking behind this, rather monkey see, monkey do.
The false Gods of Perl scream this, so all the mindless minions
join in on this screaming. They have not a clue why, however.
Perl is seriously falling to the wayside. Professionals do not
like monkey see, monkey do thinking. Professionals expect good
performance, efficiency and constant improvement. Professionals
expect a programming language to keep up, even stay ahead of
advances in technology and especially consumer demands.
Perl is stagnant. Perl has not advanced in years. Perl porters
have abandoned Perl 5 and Perl porters are no closer to releasing
Perl 6 than seven years back. In effect, Perl porters have
abandoned Perl. Today, just a bunch of monkeys chattering and
making a lot of noise but going nowhere, really fast.
Yes, Clenna, our Perl Community has become an icon of hypocrisy
and about all that is left of our Perl Community is a bunch of
control freaks who spend most of their time trolling this group,
which is leading to the demise of this group. This discussion
group is all but dead, just like Perl.
--
Purl Gurl
--
"Then again what can you expect from a fat-assed, champagne swilling,
half-breed just off the Rez?"
- Joe Kline
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-23, 8:03 am |
| On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:52:09 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>But, Larry Wall's own words do seem to add a hint of contradicting to
>soem of the preachings. Yes, it good to use what's workign well and
>accepted and I suport that notion, but if that were always the case,
>then there wouldn't be a Perl6 in the works :)
That's the default, and I'm not changing my mind ever again, at least
till next w .
- Larry Wall in p6l, "Re: method calls on $self".
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-25, 7:10 pm |
| Tad McClellan wrote:
> Clenna Lumina <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Like acceptable spelling.
>
> If some famous Perl guy would of jsut implemented a spell-correcting
> 'bot, then things would of been a lot better around here...
How is this relevant? So I speed typed. I'm sorry if I offended you,
your royal majesty.
--
CL
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-25, 7:10 pm |
| usenet@DavidFilmer.com wrote:[color=darkred]
> On Jun 25, 1:14 pm, "Clenna Lumina" <savagebea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I think you missed Tad's joke:
If you consider that a joke, then I'd urge neither of you to give up
your day jobs.
Anyhow, I still don't see what relevant baring it had on the topic.
--
CL
| |
| Tad McClellan 2007-06-25, 7:10 pm |
| Clenna Lumina <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Tad McClellan wrote:
^^^^[color=darkred]
^^^^^^^^[color=darkred]
>
> How is this relevant?
From when your name was Al MacHonahey:
Message-ID: <56184210.0209031038.3b40a9ef@posting.google.com>
> I speed typed.
Yes, that is a characteristic of your posts that helps to
identify your persona-of-the-day.
(I included 2 of the most common ones in my reply above.)
> I'm sorry if I offended you,
No you're not.
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.noitatibaher\100cmdat/"
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-25, 7:10 pm |
| On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:14:42 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>How is this relevant? So I speed typed. I'm sorry if I offended you,
>your royal majesty.
Funny that you can write as if in a sane state of mind when giving
names to someone who routinely contributes in a constructive manner to
the group whereas you seemed not to when you were compelled to "speed
type" your own "original contribution"... of... er... well... NINE
lines of text... Also funny to notice you're surprised you offended
someone -not only your respondent, BTW- given that appearently you
rate the recipients of what you wrote as not even deserving a
re-reading of the text you just typed. If your time is *SO* precious,
then perhaps you may consider not losing it at all with such
nullities...
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-25, 7:10 pm |
| Tad McClellan wrote:
> Clenna Lumina <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^
>
>
> From when your name was Al MacHonahey:
>
> Message-ID: 56184210.0209031038.3b40a9ef@posting.google.com
Ok, I'll bite. Took a look at that link, and took a look at it's
headers. I fail to see how you could of possibly connected me with that
ID. I only have one ID, and your trollish flame bait is meaningless, so
once again I hope your day job is secure.
>
>
> Yes, that is a characteristic of your posts that helps to
> identify your persona-of-the-day.
>
> (I included 2 of the most common ones in my reply above.)
One of which was your own. Looking up through the thread I only
miss-spelled "soem", tell me how this some how translates into a
"persona-of-the-day" ?
>
>
> No you're not.
That was sarcasm. I was poking fun at your idoicy.
--
CL
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-25, 7:10 pm |
| Michele Dondi wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:14:42 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
> <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Funny that you can write as if in a sane state of mind when giving
> names to someone who routinely contributes in a constructive manner to
> the group whereas you seemed not to when you were compelled to "speed
> type" your own "original contribution"... of... er... well... NINE
> lines of text... Also funny to notice you're surprised you offended
> someone -not only your respondent, BTW- given that appearently you
> rate the recipients of what you wrote as not even deserving a
> re-reading of the text you just typed. If your time is *SO* precious,
> then perhaps you may consider not losing it at all with such
> nullities...
.......................for the love of perls and heavenly grace, it was a
typo. Not exactly what I would declare a worthy candidate for the
Spanish Inquisition. It happens. "Speed type" doesn't necessary mean I
was trying type 2 million wpm, but rather a simple typographical error.
I was just conveying that I just -may have- pressed keys a wee bit too
quickly and didn't catch it. Had I realized that I would be escorted to
the gallows for such a shallow crime I might of checked a weeeeeee bit
better. Bah.
/me sits back down, kicking the soapbox aside.
--
CL
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-26, 8:03 am |
| On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:42:12 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>One of which was your own. Looking up through the thread I only
>miss-spelled "soem", tell me how this some how translates into a
>"persona-of-the-day" ?
Actually:
: seen soem regualars reepatedly tell people not to reinvent whats already
^^ ^ ^^ ^^
^^ ^ ^^ ^^
1 2 3 4
In one line...
>
>That was sarcasm. I was poking fun at your idoicy.
^^
^^
*
Please tell me *this* is a joke! :-)
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-26, 8:03 am |
| On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:52:24 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>......................for the love of perls and heavenly grace, it was a
>typo. Not exactly what I would declare a worthy candidate for the
>Spanish Inquisition. It happens. "Speed type" doesn't necessary mean I
Sorry for me giving the impression of being an inquisitor. I just feel
a little idiot for re-reading what I wrote once or twice before
posting - and still leaving typos and thinkos, of course. Maybe I'm
just an idiot to *respect* the intended recipients of my writings.
Doesn't seem a rewarding behaviour after all...
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-26, 8:03 am |
| On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:02:08 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>If you consider that a joke, then I'd urge neither of you to give up
>your day jobs.
>
>Anyhow, I still don't see what relevant baring it had on the topic.
Nor do I what these additional flamebaiting rants of your could have
on it...
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-26, 10:03 pm |
| Michele Dondi wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:02:08 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
> <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Nor do I what these additional flamebaiting rants of your could have
> on it...
And you don't see the hypocrisy in that statement? Tad decided to
provoke an argument as if the universe depends on perfect typing, and
yet _I'm_ flamebaiting? And then you jumped in with your infinite wisdom
to defend him... and accuse ME of flamebaiting? Do you really not see
how backwards you are on this?
--
CL
"Humor brings insight and tolerance. Irony brings a deeper and less
friendly understanding."
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-26, 10:03 pm |
| Michele Dondi wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:52:24 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
> <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sorry for me giving the impression of being an inquisitor. I just feel
> a little idiot for re-reading what I wrote once or twice before
> posting - and still leaving typos and thinkos, of course. Maybe I'm
> just an idiot to *respect* the intended recipients of my writings.
> Doesn't seem a rewarding behaviour after all...
Well when you're making a universe-sized stink about a grain of sand you
do tend to come across as rather anal, and thus, perhaps not as you
intended. And even as you committed the same act of indiscretion that I
chastised for, I nevertheless will not make a federal court case out of
it like some people.
--
CL
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-26, 10:03 pm |
| On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:56:50 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>And you don't see the hypocrisy in that statement? Tad decided to
>provoke an argument as if the universe depends on perfect typing, and
>yet _I'm_ flamebaiting? And then you jumped in with your infinite wisdom
>to defend him... and accuse ME of flamebaiting? Do you really not see
>how backwards you are on this?
No, sorry. A limit of mine probably. Only I'm not *defending* him,
because he needs not to, and has nothing to be defended from. OTOH I
know I've received help and wisdom from him, and he's been courteous
and respectful in my regards, nothing of which I can say about you,
period.
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-26, 10:03 pm |
| Michele Dondi wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:56:50 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
> <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> No, sorry. A limit of mine probably. Only I'm not *defending* him,
> because he needs not to, and has nothing to be defended from.
Um, yes you did. You basically came to his aid with your large but empty
paragraph after he chose to lock phasers on me for simple error.
Message-ID: <3kg0831oq60fe57akojhd3g7ras7lnofrs@4ax.com>
You want to tell me this wasn't to help push Tab's agenda?
> OTOH I
> know I've received help and wisdom from him, and he's been courteous
> and respectful in my regards,
Again, he provoked the argument of my typing skills, I'd hardly call
that "courteous and respectful", rather I'd describe it as attempting to
pick a fight.
> nothing of which I can say about you, period.
Excuse me while I laugh hysterically a moment. How in the name of
Socrates' oatmeal pudding did we go from typographical-error to me being
anti "courteous and respectful"? Can YOU really say YOU & Tad have been
"courteous and respectful" in your cru e against me?
Did I just walk through that wall-to-the-4th-dimension in that one
episode of The Twilight Zone?
--
CL
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-26, 10:03 pm |
| Michele Dondi wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:42:12 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
> <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Actually:
>
> ^^ ^ ^^ ^^
> ^^ ^ ^^ ^^
> 1 2 3 4
>
> In one line...
So what? They are just typos. You still haven't answered how this
translates into a "persona-of-the-day", you've just used common errors
to try to illustrate a non-point and such idiotic slander is getting
rather irritating, if not outright silly.
It's like the Salem witch trials all over again. I assure you, I'm flesh
and blood.
--
CL
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-26, 10:03 pm |
| [CC'ed to email]
Tad McClellan wrote:
> Clenna Lumina <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ^^^^
> ^^^^^^^^
>
>
> From when your name was Al MacHonahey:
>
> Message-ID: <56184210.0209031038.3b40a9ef@posting.google.com>
Ok, having gone back and looked again, to see why you so desperately
have it out for me, see I apparently missed this line when I examined
that post the first time. I believe I see why you were so insistent.
From: savagebea...@yahoo.com (Al MacHonahey)
This is a forgery. Assuming it is identical to my email address (google
hides part of it) then this Al MacHonahey was posting with an address he
did not own.
I've been using this email address for over 5 years as a public email
address (rather than disclose my private address.)
Furthermore, I am only a recent participant in this news group, as I was
into posting on UseNet before a few months ago, when I made the
transition from mail-list to UseNet after I discovered the list was
available there.
I hope this finally douses the flames. The firefighters have enough to
worry about near South Lake Tahoe
(http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070625...re_us/wildfires)
--
CL
| |
| Jim Carlock 2007-06-27, 7:05 pm |
| "Tad McClellan" wrote:
: Like acceptable spelling.
:
: If some famous Perl guy would of jsut implemented a spell-correcting
: 'bot, then things would of been a lot better around here...
Acceptable grammar? "would have been" or "would of been"?
With some literal translations, compare...
"will have been"
to
"will of been"
"Of" tends to make the "would" a noun and the "been" an adjective.
--
Jim Carlock
Custom Designed Swimming Pools
http://www.aquaticcreationsnc.com/s...nc/viewing1.php
| |
| Tad McClellan 2007-06-27, 7:05 pm |
| Jim Carlock <anonymous@127.0.0.1> wrote:
> "Tad McClellan" wrote:
>: Like acceptable spelling.
>:
>: If some famous Perl guy would of jsut implemented a spell-correcting
>: 'bot, then things would of been a lot better around here...
>
> Acceptable grammar? "would have been" or "would of been"?
Yes, I know. You missed the joke.
I was mocking the troll by repeating his characteristic foibles
from earlier appearances here.
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.noitatibaher\100cmdat/"
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-27, 7:05 pm |
| Tad McClellan wrote:
> Jim Carlock <anonymous@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know. You missed the joke.
>
> I was mocking the troll by repeating his characteristic foibles
> from earlier appearances here.
With respect, you were (and still are) making an ass of yourself,
continuing to perpetuate you have a solid case based solely on
fallacies. It's no different then convicting someone because they
tripped while walking down the street. It occurs by the millions every
day, yet, using Tad's logic, can somehow be just one person. A digital
pile of manure if I ever saw one.
--
CL
| |
| Art VanDelay 2007-06-28, 7:04 pm |
| Tad McClellan wrote:
> Jim Carlock <anonymous@127.0.0.1> wrote:
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
> Yes, I know. You missed the joke.
>
> I was mocking the troll by repeating his characteristic foibles
> from earlier appearances here.
Unlike someone who attacks without any provocation nor provides any
proof to back up their arguments?
What you're doing looks to me a lot more like trolling than anything the
accused has done in this thread. All you've done is sparked an off topic
tangent thread that's a waste of bandwidth and spool capacity.
--
Art
| |
| Tad McClellan 2007-06-28, 10:03 pm |
| Art VanDelay <art@xiotek.com> wrote:
> Tad McClellan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Unlike someone who attacks without any provocation
It provoked us plenty when it was here last.
> nor provides any
> proof to back up their arguments?
I predicted on June 22 that it would eventually type "jsut" or
"would of", and it did so on June 28.
Am I prescient or did I just recognize its modus operandi?
I believe most people will find the later to be more likely...
> What you're doing looks to me a lot more like trolling than anything the
> accused has done in this thread.
You *are* the accused.
Assuming another persona is the only way it/you can appear to be
getting any support. You've done it so many times that only the
gullible or uninitiated would fall for it now.
I am neither, BTW.
> All you've done is sparked an off topic
> tangent thread that's a waste of bandwidth and spool capacity.
If it helps people to ignore you, then it is not a waste, it
is a service to the commmunity.
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.noitatibaher\100cmdat/"
| |
| Art VanDelay 2007-06-29, 4:07 am |
| "Tad McClellan" <tadmc@seesig.invalid> wrote in message
news:slrnf88ggd.o52.tadmc@tadmc30.sbcglobal.net...
> Art VanDelay <art@xiotek.com> wrote:
[color=darkred]
>
>
> It provoked us plenty when it was here last.
1) YOU are the one who keep provoking, not Clenna.
2) YOU don't know it's the same person. Since Clenna started posting here,
as far as I can see, he or she has done nothing wrong, so what is your true
rationale for jumping on his or her back? Boredom?
>
>
> I predicted on June 22 that it would eventually type "jsut" or
> "would of", and it did so on June 28.
That is not a way to positively identify someone. Can you honestly tell
everyone reading here the no one else you've seen makes typos? News flash,
not everyone is perfect ('cept for you.)
> Am I prescient or did I just recognize its modus operandi?
Based on a typo? I don't think so, bub.
> I believe most people will find the later to be more likely...
^^^^^
It's "latter", and I suppose now we should all blend you into the
troll-tar-ball you put forth, for making such a grievous error.
>
>
> You *are* the accused.
Yep, I knew you would try this. One could say it's YOUR "modus operandi" to
accuse anyone you want based on such ridiculous base-less bull crap.
> Assuming another persona is the only way it/you can appear to be
> getting any support. You've done it so many times that only the
> gullible or uninitiated would fall for it now.
Good grief... look at yourself..! You're absolutely obsessed. You can't seem
to help but attempt to defame anyone who you think matches your mystery
troll theory.
This is actually a psychological disorder: "oh no, trolls everywhere, they
all have to be the same person because they all walk with a limp! The horror
the horror!"
Give it up already.
>
>
> If it helps people to ignore you, then it is not a waste, it
> is a service to the commmunity.
It's "community", btw.
Sigh... you really are a lost cause if you truly believe such off-shoot
threads are a service to ANYONE. Not when you fail to provide proof. Not
when you when you are provoking someone into responding to you in the first
place, someone who was doing nothing wrong and did not appear to deserve
such treatment.
What you have done is a DIS-service, as all it amounts to is little more
than childish name calling and name smearing with any evidence.
In other words, you're acting just like an American Politian.
--
Art
| |
| Clenna Lumina 2007-06-29, 7:03 pm |
|
"Art VanDelay" <art@xiotek.com> wrote in message
news:Iz0hi.18561$RX.4399@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
> "Tad McClellan" <tadmc@seesig.invalid> wrote in message
> news:slrnf88ggd.o52.tadmc@tadmc30.sbcglobal.net...
>
>
>
> 1) YOU are the one who keep provoking, not Clenna.
>
> 2) YOU don't know it's the same person. Since Clenna started posting here,
> as far as I can see, he or she has done nothing wrong, so what is your
> true rationale for jumping on his or her back? Boredom?
Thanks but I wouldn't waste me time arguing with people like this. They
obviously have their own agenda and prefer to hide behind thier status and
use it as an excuse to break their own rules (ie, trollish stalking.)
And btw, I'm not a female, despite how my name may sound. I don't know of
which country it actually comes from, I only know my family was originally
of eastern European decent (came to the U.S. 3 generations ago.) Believe me,
going through grade school was hard enough with a name like mine :)
| |
| Michele Dondi 2007-06-29, 7:03 pm |
| On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:03:32 -0700, "Clenna Lumina"
<savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote:
>And btw, I'm not a female, despite how my name may sound. I don't know of
>which country it actually comes from, I only know my family was originally
>of eastern European decent (came to the U.S. 3 generations ago.) Believe me,
>going through grade school was hard enough with a name like mine :)
BTW: quite a lot of people thinks I'm MicheLLe too...
Michele
--
{$_=pack'B8'x25,unpack'A8'x32,$a^=sub{po
p^pop}->(map substr
(($a||=join'',map--$|x$_,(unpack'w',unpack'u','G^<R<Y]*YB='
..'KYU;*EVH[.FHF2W+#"\Z*5TI/ER<Z`S(G.DZZ9OX0Z')=~/./g)x2,$_,
256),7,249);s/[^\w,]/ /g;$ \=/^J/?$/:"\r";print,redo}#JAPH,
|
|
|
|
|