For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > PERL Miscellaneous > November 2007 > Re: Google bad, Yahoo good









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Google bad, Yahoo good
Ted Zlatanov

2007-11-26, 7:13 pm

On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:53:34 -0800 merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:

RLS> If I recall, Google withdrew that API about six months ago, replacing with a
RLS> page-embedded search result API that ensures that their ads will also show up
RLS> in the right place. Yech.
....
RLS> So much for Google "doing no evil". Yahoo for the win.

Withdrawing a public API is an inconvenience to its users but hardly
qualifies as "evil" in my opinion. Let's be fair.

Ted
Randal L. Schwartz

2007-11-26, 7:13 pm

>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

Ted> Withdrawing a public API is an inconvenience to its users but hardly
Ted> qualifies as "evil" in my opinion. Let's be fair.

I disagree. The closest equivalent API (the client-side embedded javascript)
burdens all results with google ads. So, this seems to be a change only to
line the pocketbooks of the stockholders. Still convinced it's not evil?

print "Just another Perl hacker,"; # the original

--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
xhoster@gmail.com

2007-11-26, 7:13 pm

merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
>
> Ted> Withdrawing a public API is an inconvenience to its users but hardly
> Ted> qualifies as "evil" in my opinion. Let's be fair.
>
> I disagree. The closest equivalent API (the client-side embedded
> javascript) burdens all results with google ads. So, this seems to be a
> change only to line the pocketbooks of the stockholders. Still convinced
> it's not evil?


Yes. Not being a charity is not the same thing as being evil.

Xho

--
-------------------- http://NewsReader.Com/ --------------------
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate
this fact.
Sherman Pendley

2007-11-26, 7:13 pm

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> Let's be fair.


Fair? This is usenet! :-)

sherm--

--
WV News, Blogging, and Discussion: http://wv-www.com
Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com