For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > PERL Miscellaneous > August 2005 > FAQ 4.18 Does Perl have a Year 2000 problem? Is Perl Y2K compliant?









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author FAQ 4.18 Does Perl have a Year 2000 problem? Is Perl Y2K compliant?
PerlFAQ Server

2005-08-28, 3:56 am

This message is one of several periodic postings to comp.lang.perl.misc
intended to make it easier for perl programmers to find answers to
common questions. The core of this message represents an excerpt
from the documentation provided with Perl.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

4.18: Does Perl have a Year 2000 problem? Is Perl Y2K compliant?

Short answer: No, Perl does not have a Year 2000 problem. Yes, Perl is
Y2K compliant (whatever that means). The programmers you've hired to use
it, however, probably are not.

Long answer: The question belies a true understanding of the issue. Perl
is just as Y2K compliant as your pencil--no more, and no less. Can you
use your pencil to write a non-Y2K-compliant memo? Of course you can. Is
that the pencil's fault? Of course it isn't.

The date and time functions supplied with Perl (gmtime and localtime)
supply adequate information to determine the year well beyond 2000 (2038
is when trouble strikes for 32-bit machines). The year returned by these
functions when used in a list context is the year minus 1900. For years
between 1910 and 1999 this *happens* to be a 2-digit decimal number. To
avoid the year 2000 problem simply do not treat the year as a 2-digit
number. It isn't.

When gmtime() and localtime() are used in scalar context they return a
timestamp string that contains a fully-expanded year. For example,
"$timestamp = gmtime(1005613200)" sets $timestamp to "Tue Nov 13
01:00:00 2001". There's no year 2000 problem here.

That doesn't mean that Perl can't be used to create non-Y2K compliant
programs. It can. But so can your pencil. It's the fault of the user,
not the language. At the risk of inflaming the NRA: "Perl doesn't break
Y2K, people do." See http://www.perl.org/about/y2k.html for a longer
exposition.



--------------------------------------------------------------------

Documents such as this have been called "Answers to Frequently
Asked Questions" or FAQ for short. They represent an important
part of the Usenet tradition. They serve to reduce the volume of
redundant traffic on a news group by providing quality answers to
questions that keep coming up.

If you are some how irritated by seeing these postings you are free
to ignore them or add the sender to your killfile. If you find
errors or other problems with these postings please send corrections
or comments to the posting email address or to the maintainers as
directed in the perlfaq manual page.

Note that the FAQ text posted by this server may have been modified
from that distributed in the stable Perl release. It may have been
edited to reflect the additions, changes and corrections provided
by respondents, reviewers, and critics to previous postings of
these FAQ. Complete text of these FAQ are available on request.

The perlfaq manual page contains the following copyright notice.

AUTHOR AND COPYRIGHT

Copyright (c) 1997-2002 Tom Christiansen and Nathan
Torkington, and other contributors as noted. All rights
reserved.

This posting is provided in the hope that it will be useful but
does not represent a commitment or contract of any kind on the part
of the contributers, authors or their agents.
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com