Home > Archive > PERL Miscellaneous > February 2005 > Re: generic equivalence partition
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: generic equivalence partition
|
|
| Xah Lee 2005-02-26, 8:57 pm |
| People,
.... sorry for the latching on on this broadside issue, but it is
impotant ...
here's are some germane points from another online discussion:
the bug-reporting issue has came up so many times by so many people i
thought i'd make a comment of my view.
when a software is ostensibly incorrect, and if it is likely in
connection to egregious irresponsibility as most software companies are
thru their irresponsible licensing, the thing one should not do is to
fawn up to their ass as in filing a bug report, and that is also the
least effective in correcting the software.
the common attitude of bug-reporting is one reason that contributed to
the tremendous egregious irresponsible XXXXups in computer software
industry that each of us have to endure daily all the time. (e.g.
software A clashed, software B can't do this, C can't do that, D i
don't know how to use, E download location currently broken, F i need
to join discussion group to find a work-around, G is all pretty and
dysfunctional... )
when a software is ostensibly incorrect and when the company is
irresponsible with their licensing, the most effective and moral
attitude is to do legal harm to the legal entity. This one an do by
filing a law suit or spreading the fact. Filing a law suit is
appropriate in severe and serious cases, and provided you have such
devotion to the cause. For most cases, we should just spread the fact.
When a company see facts flying about their incompetence or
irresponsibility, they will immediately mend the problem source, or
cease to exist.
Another harm sprang from the XXXXing bug-reporting attitude rampant
among IT morons is the multiplication of pop-ups that bug users for
bug-reporting, complete with their privacy intrusion legalese.
http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/...le_license.html
Xah
xah@xahlee.org
http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html
Xah Lee wrote:
> folks:
>
> when using google to post a reply, it sometimes truncates the subject
> line. i.e. [perl-python] is lost. This software error is obvious,
they
> could not have not noticed it.
>
> another thing more egregious is that google _intentionally_ edit with
> people's posts. (e.g. they change email address lines without
author's
> permission, and they also change program codes so it no longer run).
> Please spread these google irresponsibility to all related forums on
> software responsibility and online forum issues.
>
> Ostensible incorrect behavior like these by google is egregious
enough
> to generate a law suit and if such company do not take software
> correctness seriously, we must punish them.
>
> Please spread this awareness.
>
> Xah
> xah@xahlee.org
> http://xahlee.org/PageTwo_dir/more.html
| |
| Erik Max Francis 2005-02-26, 8:57 pm |
| Xah Lee wrote:
> ... sorry for the latching on on this broadside issue, but it is
> impotant ...
You made a typo in that last word there. Obviously you meant to write
an _e_ instead of an _a_.
--
Erik Max Francis && max@alcyone.com && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis
All bad poetry springs from genuine feeling.
-- Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|