For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > PERL Modules > March 2006 > thoughts on modules naming









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author thoughts on modules naming
gray@cpan.org

2006-03-23, 7:58 am

I'm planning a module to provide a binding to a graphing library called
igraph [1]. I originally chose Graph::LibIgraph as the name, but it
was suggested Graph::igraph or Graph::libigraph might be better.
Depending upon context, the term igraph can mean an interactive or
inheritance graph so the former isn't a good choice. Searching through
CPAN there doesn't seem to be a standard way to name library bindings.
These appear to be the choices: Graph::LibIgraph, Igraph::Lib,
Lib::Igraph, Graph::libigraph, Graph::igraphlib. I plan on implementing
an API similar to the already existing Graph module, so mine should
also fall under the Graph namespace. Any thoughts?

[1] http://cneurocvs.rmki.kfki.hu/igraph/

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com