Home > Archive > PHP Language > November 2007 > ajax and php
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| Jean Pierre Daviau 2007-10-31, 7:00 pm |
|
Bonjour à tous,
I no nothing about ajax. I understand php, C, Java and
JavaScript.
I red on Amazon that the so called Ajax's books "are mainly about
JavaScript (client) and not much about Ajax (client server)"
Is there a valuable book to learn Ajax?
Is ther something on the web?
--
Thanks for your attention.
Jean Pierre Daviau
--
windows Xp
asus p4 s533/333/133
Intel(R) Celeron (R) CPU 2.00 GHz
Processor Radeon7000 0x5159 agp
| |
| Michael 2007-10-31, 10:00 pm |
| AJAX stands for Asynchronous Javascript And XML. You already know a
server-side language (PHP), and you also already understand Javascript.
I believe the only thing missing is XML, pick up a book or read some
online material. Once you've done that AJAX is like second nature.
Also I'd suggest taking a look at, http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/AJAX
- Michael
Jean Pierre Daviau wrote:
> Bonjour à tous,
>
> I no nothing about ajax. I understand php, C, Java and
> JavaScript.
>
> I red on Amazon that the so called Ajax's books "are mainly about
> JavaScript (client) and not much about Ajax (client server)"
>
>
> Is there a valuable book to learn Ajax?
>
> Is ther something on the web?
>
| |
| Jean Pierre Daviau 2007-11-01, 7:00 pm |
| Thank you. That's clear enough.
:-)
"Michael" <michael_j@pythontech.net.au> a écrit dans le message
de news: 0269d683$0$17458$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com...[color=darkred]
> AJAX stands for Asynchronous Javascript And XML. You already
> know a server-side language (PHP), and you also already
> understand Javascript. I believe the only thing missing is XML,
> pick up a book or read some online material. Once you've done
> that AJAX is like second nature.
>
> Also I'd suggest taking a look at,
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/AJAX
>
> - Michael
>
> Jean Pierre Daviau wrote:
| |
| Onideus Mad Hatter 2007-11-02, 4:00 am |
| On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:18:20 -0400, "Jean Pierre Daviau"
<Once@WasEno.ugh> wrote:
>
>Bonjour à tous,
>
>I no nothing about ajax. I understand php, C, Java and
>JavaScript.
AJAX is just a techno buzz word, it doesn't really have any meaning in
most conversations (when being used by wannabes and poser class
dipshits). It's basically a site that relies heavily on javascript,
XML and CSS and is often dynamic in nature.
The concept of AJAX was actually ripped off and dumbed down from
existing concepts, like my "living site" designs (aka God level
coding). Basically the intent is to make a site that acts like a
living creature and will react and change depending on user
interaction. So if you say click on a link it will change the
existing content within itself, rather than taking you to a different
page.
As I said though, that concept was stolen (and not just from me) and
then dumbed down to specific languages/forms. The concept was NEVER
intended to be exclusive to any specific language forms, although most
early sites in that form used a lot of javascript/CSS/XML. At this
point, most developers who actually know what the hell it is they're
doing are using a combination of Flash/CSS/XML and PHP to construct
their sites.
The other problem with AJAX, is that beyond the fact that it's a
ripped off and watered down concept, it has become a techno-babble
buzz word, meaning it's often abused and misused by the clueless and
poser class wannabes of the world. I would estimate that a good 90%+
of all the people throwing that word around have absolutely no XXXXin
clue at all as to what it even pertains to.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally XXXXX slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the XXXX up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty XXXXing high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."
"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."
"How  that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
| |
|
| On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:18:20 -0400, "Jean Pierre Daviau"
<Once@WasEno.ugh> wrote:
>
>Bonjour à tous,
>
>I no nothing about ajax. I understand php, C, Java and
>JavaScript.
>
>I red on Amazon that the so called Ajax's books "are mainly about
>JavaScript (client) and not much about Ajax (client server)"
>
>
>Is there a valuable book to learn Ajax?
>
>Is ther something on the web?
>
>--
>Thanks for your attention.
>
>Jean Pierre Daviau
look at xajax
http://www.xajaxproject.org/docs/xa...-10-minutes.php
and study the examples. you can do some pretty  stuff with it and
it's not to diificult to learn.
also study jQuery
http://jquery.com/
good luck
| |
| Michael 2007-11-04, 7:00 pm |
| Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:18:20 -0400, "Jean Pierre Daviau"
> <Once@WasEno.ugh> wrote:
>
>
> AJAX is just a techno buzz word, it doesn't really have any meaning in
> most conversations (when being used by wannabes and poser class
> dipshits). It's basically a site that relies heavily on javascript,
> XML and CSS and is often dynamic in nature.
AJAX is not a techno 'buzz' word. It is an acronym that stands for
Asynchronous JavaScript and XML. I would say it is ALWAYS dynamic in
nature, as AJAX would not make sense on a static site.
An AJAX site does not need to rely heavily on CSS at all. How ever Web
Developers may choose to assign CSS classes by Javascript, to achieve a
combination of transition effects, or UI feedback. For example,
highlighting invalid content in a field.
>
> The concept of AJAX was actually ripped off and dumbed down from
> existing concepts, like my "living site" designs (aka God level
> coding). Basically the intent is to make a site that acts like a
> living creature and will react and change depending on user
> interaction. So if you say click on a link it will change the
> existing content within itself, rather than taking you to a different
> page.
>
Your an idiot. Living Creature? No one ripped you off, no one ripped
anyone off, it has been around for sometime, and is just a term for a
general way of doing something. BTW, Microsoft invented the
XMLHttpRequest and used it for Outlook Web Access. This is 7 and a bit
years ago. Considering your site was registered 21 May 2003, I fail to
see how you came up with this first.
Also, I fail to see how you were planning to do all of this without
Microsoft inventing the technology and Netscape expanding it, and other
browsers incorporating it.
> As I said though, that concept was stolen (and not just from me) and
> then dumbed down to specific languages/forms. The concept was NEVER
> intended to be exclusive to any specific language forms, although most
> early sites in that form used a lot of javascript/CSS/XML. At this
> point, most developers who actually know what the hell it is they're
> doing are using a combination of Flash/CSS/XML and PHP to construct
> their sites.
>
I repeat, your an idiot, your Flash sites are HORRIBLE.
> The other problem with AJAX, is that beyond the fact that it's a
> ripped off and watered down concept, it has become a techno-babble
> buzz word, meaning it's often abused and misused by the clueless and
> poser class wannabes of the world. I would estimate that a good 90%+
> of all the people throwing that word around have absolutely no XXXXin
> clue at all as to what it even pertains to.
>
It's easy to determine if something is AJAX or not. I would estimate any
project that claims to use AJAX most likely DOES use AJAX, or
Asynchronous Javascript, or a very similar method. However, I'd say you
are definitely in the 90% of people who don't know what they are talking
about. You are the biggest troll in this group. Maybe your thinking Web 2.0?
| |
| Onideus Mad Hatter 2007-11-05, 7:00 pm |
| On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:06:04 +1030, Michael
<michael_j@pythontech.net.au> wrote:
[color=darkred]
>AJAX is not a techno 'buzz' word.
You really are living in a bubble of stupidity, aren't you?
>It is an acronym that stands for Asynchronous JavaScript and XML.
When you capitalize javascript...it makes you look stupid, just so you
know. And just because it's an acronym that stands for something
doesn't the XXXX mean that 90%+ of the retards throwing the word
around know XXXX all about it, other than it sounds "new" and "edgy"
and "the other guys have it".
>I would say it is ALWAYS dynamic in
>nature, as AJAX would not make sense on a static site.
Technically speaking the acronym itself doesn't make much sense
period.
>An AJAX site does not need to rely heavily on CSS at all.
Um, it sort of helps you goober. Let's see, list all the AJAX type
sites that you know of that DON'T have any CSS! DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM
>How ever Web
>Developers may choose to assign CSS classes by Javascript,
And now you're referring to it as "Javascript"...*sigh*...sign of a
clueless XXXXin newbie.
>to achieve a
>combination of transition effects, or UI feedback. For example,
>highlighting invalid content in a field.
You could do it without CSS, that's not the point, the point is that
with CSS it's EASIER, hence the reason why it's pretty much ALWAYS
used...unless you're just some monumental dumbXXXX.
[color=darkred]
>Your an idiot.
You really shouldn't call other people idiots when you can't even
figure out the difference between "your" and "you're" you XXXXin
idiot.
>Living Creature?
Think slow now, don't hurt yourself.
>No one ripped you off, no one ripped
>anyone off, it has been around for sometime, and is just a term for a
>general way of doing something.
Look here you n00b ass XXXX job, in case it just skipped yer idiot ass
the gawd damn Internet has been around for a XXXX of a lot longer than
yer dumbass has been online (according to Google you just started
posting like...last month. And yes, you drooler, dynamic sites
existed way, way, WAY the XXXX before AJAX was ever coined and pimped
out to college flunkie retards like yourself.
>BTW, Microsoft invented the
>XMLHttpRequest and used it for Outlook Web Access. This is 7 and a bit
>years ago. Considering your site was registered 21 May 2003, I fail to
>see how you came up with this first.
My domain was registered in 2003 you XXXX job, a look into my Google
history spans back to around 1995 and there are no shortage of
websites I made PRIOR to having my own domain (most notably when my
sites were hosted via petitmorte). Further, you dipshit, you DON'T
need to use XML in order to make a dynamic site (you obviously missed
that point in my last post).
>Also, I fail to see how you were planning to do all of this without
>Microsoft inventing the technology and Netscape expanding it, and other
>browsers incorporating it.
The fact that you DON'T NEED XML TO MAKE A DYNAMIC SITE! Yeesh, write
it the XXXX down if yer having so much trouble you idiot XXXX. That
was the whole gawd damn shitting POINT of my last post, that AJAX
dumbed the XXXXin concept down and restricted it to XML when in fact
you don't need ANY XML to make a dynamic site.
[color=darkred]
>I repeat, your an idiot, your Flash sites are HORRIBLE.
As XXXXin stupid as you are it obviously skipped you that there's a
whole lot more to my sites than Flash. Most of my newer sites are a
combination of Flash, CSS, XML, javascript, vbscript, PHP, etc. Also,
it's cute to see you run the XXXX at the mouth about *MY* sites when:
A. you can't even sum up enough intelligence to explain WHAT you
supposedly think is horrible about my sites.
and...
B. you're a stupid college flunkie retard who doesn't even HAVE any
sites of yer own to provide as a basis of comparison. Face it
d00d...yer just some XXXXin wannabe, poser class dipshit. You run at
the mouth real good, but you ain't got shit to back it up with.
[color=darkred]
>It's easy to determine if something is AJAX or not. I would estimate any
>project that claims to use AJAX most likely DOES use AJAX, or
>Asynchronous Javascript, or a very similar method.
The idiot XXXX high school dropout whose obviously never worked a day
in the business is trying to make "estimates"...oh that's cute,
really. The best way of ACTUALLY determining if a person knows what
AJAX means is to find a job listing where it says they're looking for
someone "who knows AJAX", then just go to the interview. It won't
take too long to poke at them in the right places to see if they even
understand the position that they're hiring for (very often they
don't).
> However, I'd say you
>are definitely in the 90% of people who don't know what they are talking
>about. You are the biggest troll in this group. Maybe your thinking Web 2.0?
You are without a doubt the biggest retard in this group. Let us all
know when you figure out the difference between "your" and "you're"
you drooling child.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally XXXXX slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the XXXX up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty XXXXing high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."
"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."
"How that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
| |
| Michael 2007-11-05, 10:00 pm |
| Check it out I'm Onideus and I'm XXXX XXXX XXXXity XXXX XXXX. Did
they teach you that extensive vocabulary during your college days, or
did you pick that up living in the street with the homeless?
I could be petty and list all the spelling and grammar mistakes you
managed to put in your post, but I wont waste my time. People make
mistakes deal with it.
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:06:04 +1030, Michael
> <michael_j@pythontech.net.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> You really are living in a bubble of stupidity, aren't you?
>
>
> When you capitalize javascript...it makes you look stupid, just so you
> know. And just because it's an acronym that stands for something
> doesn't the XXXX mean that 90%+ of the retards throwing the word
> around know XXXX all about it, other than it sounds "new" and "edgy"
> and "the other guys have it".
>
Look it up, it is capitalized "JavaScript". I never claimed that '90%+
of the retards throwing the word around know f..k all about it'. As
clearly you thought it was just a buzz word.
>
> Technically speaking the acronym itself doesn't make much sense
> period.
>
>
> Um, it sort of helps you goober. Let's see, list all the AJAX type
> sites that you know of that DON'T have any CSS! DUM DUM DUM DUM DUM
I merely stated that CSS is not required to use AJAX.
>
>
> And now you're referring to it as "Javascript"...*sigh*...sign of a
> clueless XXXXin newbie.
>
Yes my bad, it should be capitalized having trouble with my shift key
today, 'JavaScript', happy?
>
> You could do it without CSS, that's not the point, the point is that
> with CSS it's EASIER, hence the reason why it's pretty much ALWAYS
> used...unless you're just some monumental dumbXXXX.
Do it without CSS...
document.write('<font color="#ff0000">haha</font>');
Doesn't really do it now does it? Or if you are referring to the style
object, it is just used to dynamically change CSS properties... So it
wouldn't be without CSS.
>
>
>
> You really shouldn't call other people idiots when you can't even
> figure out the difference between "your" and "you're" you XXXXin
> idiot.
>
Watch out it's the grammar police, with his little siren, and his
colourful vocabulary.
>
> Think slow now, don't hurt yourself.
Ok, I've thought about it and still all I can come up with is WTF? How
is your site(s) anything like a living creature?
>
>
> Look here you n00b ass XXXX job, in case it just skipped yer idiot ass
> the gawd damn Internet has been around for a XXXX of a lot longer than
> yer dumbass has been online (according to Google you just started
> posting like...last month. And yes, you drooler, dynamic sites
> existed way, way, WAY the XXXX before AJAX was ever coined and pimped
> out to college flunkie retards like yourself.
It's your not yer. It's god not gawd. Flunkie? Oh the point is, if
you're going to be a grammar nazi, you should at least check your own
text before posting.
First of all, Usenet is not the internet. Second of all, indeed the
Internet has been around before I was online... It had to exist before I
could use it right, and I never invented it!
I never went to college, but maybe you should.
>
>
> My domain was registered in 2003 you XXXX job, a look into my Google
> history spans back to around 1995 and there are no shortage of
> websites I made PRIOR to having my own domain (most notably when my
> sites were hosted via petitmorte). Further, you dipshit, you DON'T
> need to use XML in order to make a dynamic site (you obviously missed
> that point in my last post).
>
No, but it wouldn't be AJAX without XML :).
I don't see any legal identity behind your half assed "web design"
business.
Sorry, whilst I was researching your previous work, all that come up
with in Google was how stupid you are... And no thats not a joke... When
EVERYONE thinks you are retarded, don't you sort of get the feeling they
might be right?
>
> The fact that you DON'T NEED XML TO MAKE A DYNAMIC SITE! Yeesh, write
> it the XXXX down if yer having so much trouble you idiot XXXX. That
> was the whole gawd damn shitting POINT of my last post, that AJAX
> dumbed the XXXXin concept down and restricted it to XML when in fact
> you don't need ANY XML to make a dynamic site.
>
If you don't want to use AJAX don't. Get over it. Use JavaScript and
dynamically include more JavaScript.
>
>
> As XXXXin stupid as you are it obviously skipped you that there's a
> whole lot more to my sites than Flash. Most of my newer sites are a
> combination of Flash, CSS, XML, javascript, vbscript, PHP, etc. Also,
> it's cute to see you run the XXXX at the mouth about *MY* sites when:
>
I wonder how well HTML 3.2 supported CSS. I guess not to well
considering someone is still using <font color="">. People used Flash in
1996? VBScript yuck. You know bout as much as my next door neighbors 12
year old son.
> A. you can't even sum up enough intelligence to explain WHAT you
> supposedly think is horrible about my sites.
>
I don't need to, they speak for themselves.
> and...
>
> B. you're a stupid college flunkie retard who doesn't even HAVE any
> sites of yer own to provide as a basis of comparison. Face it
> d00d...yer just some XXXXin wannabe, poser class dipshit. You run at
> the mouth real good, but you ain't got shit to back it up with.
I work for a professional web development firm. I will choose to protect
the integrity of the company I work for. I don't feel the need to prove
myself to you.
>
>
>
> The idiot XXXX high school dropout whose obviously never worked a day
> in the business is trying to make "estimates"...oh that's cute,
> really. The best way of ACTUALLY determining if a person knows what
> AJAX means is to find a job listing where it says they're looking for
> someone "who knows AJAX", then just go to the interview. It won't
> take too long to poke at them in the right places to see if they even
> understand the position that they're hiring for (very often they
> don't).
Look, am I a high school dropout, or a college school dropout.
Consistency is the key. Was Walmart looking for AJAX?
>
>
> You are without a doubt the biggest retard in this group. Let us all
> know when you figure out the difference between "your" and "you're"
> you drooling child.
>
I bet your 'e-business' makes you so much money, which helps with your
'e-penis' when you pick up all your 'e-ladies'.
> --
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter
> mhm ¹ x ¹
> http://www.backwater-productions.net
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
>
>
> Hatter Quotes
> -------------
> "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
> best."
>
> "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally XXXXX slapped you
> with it."
>
> "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
>
> "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
>
> "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the XXXX up!"
>
> "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
> bad."
>
> "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
>
> "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
>
> "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
> of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
>
> "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
> that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
> of its relevancy."
>
> "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
> creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
>
> "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
>
> "People are pretty XXXXing high on themselves if they think that
> they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
> givin em out for free."
>
> "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
> So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
> to their merry little mess."
>
> "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
> horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
> their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
> sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
> images burned into their tiny little minds'."
>
> "How that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
> properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
>
> "Those who record history are those who control history."
>
> "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
> endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
> don't get sent to me...I come for you."
>
> "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
> tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
>
> "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
> function?"
>
> "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
> Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
> indicates an increase in Webtv users."
>
> "Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
> gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
| |
| Onideus Mad Hatter 2007-11-06, 7:59 am |
| On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:14:42 +1030, Michael
<michael_j@pythontech.net.au> wrote:
>Check it out
You're top poasting! Wow, how retarded of you! What amazing trick
will you show us next Cap'n Retard?
>I'm Onideus and I'm XXXX XXXX XXXXity XXXX XXXX. Did
>they teach you that extensive vocabulary during your college days, or
>did you pick that up living in the street with the homeless?
No I picked it up out of necessity when I started having to deal with
complete XXXXin retards like yourself.
>I could be petty and list all the spelling and grammar mistakes you
>managed to put in your post, but I wont waste my time. People make
>mistakes deal with it.
There's a difference between a mistake and outright ignorance. A
"mistake" implies that you were AWARE of the PROPER way and not simply
ignorant of it. The fact that you managed to make the "mistake"
multiple times throughout your post clearly shows you haven't a XXXXin
clue. Oh but hey, here's a free one for ya...generally speaking the
only people who mistake "your" with "you're" are high school kids...or
people who dropped out of high school...take yer pick, Kiddo.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>Look it up, it is capitalized "JavaScript".
Free cl00, Retard, when you say "JavaScript" you're only talking about
ONE SPECIFIC TYPE of javascript (do note the lack of capitals). When
referring to ALL FORMS of javascript you DO NOT capitalize it, you
XXXXin amateur level retard.
> I never claimed that '90%+
>of the retards throwing the word around know f..k all about it'. As
>clearly you thought it was just a buzz word.
Reading comprehension really isn't your strong suit, is it? BTW, why
can't you say the word XXXX, did your parents put a Net Nanny filter
on your lil Dell peecee, or were you just psychologically and
physically BEATEN to feel dirty every time you hear or see the word
XXXX! *shudder* Just sent shivers down yer spine, didn't it?
Probably had flash backs to bars of soap in yer mouth and a leather
belt blistered across yer lil ass, huh?
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>I merely stated that CSS is not required to use AJAX.
And neither is XML needed to make a dynamic site, hence AJAX is as
full of shit as a Christmas turkey.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>Yes my bad, it should be capitalized having trouble with my shift key
>today, 'JavaScript', happy?
You never stop being retarded, do you?
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>Do it without CSS...
>
>document.write('<font color="#ff0000">haha</font>');
>
>Doesn't really do it now does it?
....doesn't do what? What the XXXX are you babbling about now?
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>Watch out it's the grammar police, with his little siren, and his
>colourful vocabulary.
Don't get all pissy and upset with me, you're the one who made an
idiot of yourself, idiot. I didn't make reality, I just verbally
XXXXX slapped you with it.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>Ok, I've thought about it and still all I can come up with is WTF? How
>is your site(s) anything like a living creature?
I have more than one site, Dumbass. And this site is the best example
of God Level coding I have:
http://www.backwater-productions.ne...latform/liquid/
Here's teh primary source:
http://www.backwater-productions.ne...d/JS_Source.txt
See the idea is to break code up into fragments, like DNA bits and
then you sequence and resequence those "DNA" code bits in order to
change and alter the site. The site is "living" in that it reacts to
what the user does. When a user clicks on a link for example, rather
than taking you to a different page the site changes ITSELF, it REACTS
like a living creature to the stimulus (the user action). The code
form isn't restricted to any particular language, the only
requirements are that the site be dynamic and that you make use of
fragmenting redundant code bits, kind of a higher level form of CSS.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>It's your not yer. It's god not gawd. Flunkie?
Look kid, yer slow, so I can see as how you skipped the finer points
of language mechanics, specifically those involving the use of SLANG,
in this particular case USENET SLANG. Words like poast, yer, gawd,
cl00, n00b, etc. Such words are NOT mistakes, they are made
INTENTIONALLY with full knowledge of their history, form and usage.
>Oh the point is, if
>you're going to be a grammar nazi, you should at least check your own
>text before posting.
Pointing out the hypocrisy and irony of your posts isn't being a
grammar Nazi, it's MOCKING YOU, you stupid retard.
>First of all, Usenet is not the internet.
Yes, it is, you XXXX job. Usenet is apart of the Internet just as the
World Wide Web, IRC networks, etc are apart of the Internet. You seem
like a Webbie tard though so I can understand your confusion, we
Netters generally don't much like your kind, we were here nearly a
decade before you droolers ever even had the WWW.
>Second of all, indeed the
>Internet has been around before I was online... It had to exist before I
>could use it right, and I never invented it!
Your quibbling over semantics doesn't change the fact that your
dumbass only discovered the online world about a w ago, Downs.
>I never went to college,
It shows.
>but maybe you should.
Been there, done that, but then, it's pretty obvious, what with how I
know the difference between "your" and "you're" and also seeing as how
I understand the difference between a mistake, ignorant stupidity and
generally accepted slang.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>No, but it wouldn't be AJAX without XML :).
As I said, AJAX was ripped off from existing concepts and dumbed down,
restricted to a single language form (XML) and then given a cutesy
little acronym for Webbie tards like yourself to teeth on.
>I don't see any legal identity behind your half assed "web design"
>business.
>Sorry, whilst I was researching your previous work, all that come up
>with in Google was how stupid you are... And no thats not a joke... When
>EVERYONE thinks you are retarded, don't you sort of get the feeling they
>might be right?
You're obviously not looking very hard child. It's true that Hatter
Addicts tend to scream loudest, but their obsessive compulsive posting
disorders in no way make up the sum total of the net.populous. You're
also exercising gross ignorance in failing to see the design behind
most of my posts. You must have missed this part of my .sig:
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
Most of my posts are designed to attack people in order to get them to
lash out at my work in the most critical and obsessive way imaginable,
often to the point where they're snitting about pixel level
differences. I then use those overly harsh critiques in order to
further and advance my work. I also use it as a means of gauging the
intelligence of people. For example those who lash out have poor
emotional control, they're unstable and most often drama queens. And
then beyond that I can gauge a posters technical intelligence.
Basically you have those who can actually formulate halfway coherent
critiques of my work and then, in your case, those who can't do much
more than scream, "IT SUCKS!" Those of your class are just drooling
posers lashing out in jealous rage, pissed off that I have skill and
you don't and then having to endure my bragging, arrogant attitude.
It just burns you up inside, huh? `, )
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>If you don't want to use AJAX don't.
Uh, I don't, what the XXXX are you talking about?
>Get over it.
You get over it, Shitface. I'll verbally smack around any senseless
XXXXX ridden techno buzz word stupidity I like, if you got yer panties
all up in a twist about it you got two choices...XXXX off...or XXXXX
about it. As it seems yer goin for the later you best get yerself a
tampon and pop a couple Midol, cause I ain't goin away, Sunshine.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>I wonder how well HTML 3.2 supported CSS. I guess not to well
>considering someone is still using <font color="">.
I use what works, Stupid. As XXXXin n00b level as you are you're
obviously confusing W3C compliance with cross compatibility. The W3C
only RECOMMENDS standards, they do not SET standards and since NO
browser maker on the planet fully adheres to those RECOMMENDATIONS
they are, at best, completely worthless.
And although some of my code may not look "right" by whatever failure
of a public education system that you were spoon fed from, I can
assure you, it's all intentional and it was all done in order to
achieve the MAXIMUM level of cross browser and cross operating system
compatibility. This is why I'm now using Flash as a primary front end
for all my sites, because as far as cross compatibility there is
nothing better than Flash.
And unlike yer stupid n00b ass, I don't take anything at face value
online, I actually test EVERYTHING myself to make damn sure it works.
Way too often have I found mistakes on sites listing the compatibility
of code properties and such. Often because they don't test on ALL
browser versions, or they ASSume that the rendering engine of a
browser on one OS is the same as on another (especially regarding IE
on the Mac).
>People used Flash in 1996?
Not to the extent that it's being used now, but it was introduced in
1996 and those on the cutting edge of web design certainly played with
it and certainly saw the potential that it had. It's taken nearly a
decade for that potential to be reached, but now that it has...ain't
nothin better. In my opinion it was worth the wait.
>VBScript yuck.
I like how you keep doing that. Rather than giving any specifics
about anything you just generalize all your NONpinions, like "yuck",
"it sucks", "it's bad", "I don't like it", etc, etc. Where as if you
ACTUALLY knew what the XXXX you were talking about you would be able
to convey specific things as to why you think it's "yuck" in this
case. Until you can manage to do that your "opinions" are worth about
as much as the toilet paper I wiped my ass with this morning and then
flushed down the crapper.
>You know bout as much as my next door neighbors 12
>year old son.
This from the drooler who can't even manage to make a site of his own.
[color=darkred]
>I don't need to, they speak for themselves.
Woo Hoo, it's BINGO TIME!
http://backwater-productions.net/da...net%20Bingo.png
* puts a tab on "refusal to back up claims". *
I just love this game. ^_^
[color=darkred]
>I work for a professional web development firm. I will choose to protect
>the integrity of the company I work for. I don't feel the need to prove
>myself to you.
http://backwater-productions.net/da...net%20Bingo.png
Woo Hoo! Got another one!
* puts a tab on "My secret sources I can't talk about say..." *
Free cl00, Dipshit, EVERY web developer has a portfolio of their work
available which IS NOT directly linked to the company they're
currently working for. Not to mention, what the XXXX kind of web
designer wouldn't have any personal sites of their own? I mean that'd
akin to being a graphic designer and having no personal art work you
made for yourself. To put it another way...you're a lying Dipshit and
it's REALLY easy to spot.
You have no websites, you have no skill and all the better you can do
is snit and covet OTHER people's work whilst you run the XXXX at the
mouth about shit you don't even comprehend. As I said before, you're
nothing but a poser class n00b.job, a web designer wannabe.
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>Look, am I a high school dropout, or a college school dropout.
....holy shit, he doesn't even know what grade he was in when he
dropped out of school. *shakes head*
>Consistency is the key.
In your case it's consistent failure.
>Was Walmart looking for AJAX?
I don't know, were they?
[color=darkred]
[color=darkred]
>I bet your 'e-business' makes you so much money, which helps with your
>'e-penis' when you pick up all your 'e-ladies'.
Well the money part for sure, unlike you though I don't have much need
for a virtual dick since I have a real one and since I only prefer
REAL women, who, most often really aren't interested that much in
Internet stuff...well, as far as I know, I don't really go out of my
way to yammer on much about the Internet to people I know in real
life. I assume most of them don't much care and quite frankly I like
it better that way. The Internet was a FAR better place before they
started marketing it to your particular brand of stupidity.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm ¹ x ¹
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.backwater-productions.net/hatter-blog
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally XXXXX slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Your Usenet blinders are my best friend."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the XXXX up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n such...mmmm..."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty XXXXing high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of quibling...everywhere.
So the Hare took a long stare and decided at best, to leave the rest,
to their merry little mess."
"There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly
horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they violently rip
their heads off, their blood spraying into the faces of a thousand
sweet innocent horrified children, who will forever have the terrible
images burned into their tiny little minds'."
"How that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
| |
|
|
|
|
|