PHP PEAR Questions and Answers - Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_PackageFileManager PackageFileManager.php PackageFi

Author

Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: cvs: pear /PEAR_PackageFileManager PackageFileManager.php PackageFi

Jon Parise

2008-01-13, 7:04 pm

On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 07:45:38PM +0100, Laurent Laville wrote:

> Of course Arnaud
> I am opposed to a lack of communication, and not to the work itself.
> Without communication it is the gateway to everything and anything
> without rule : "The Jungle, what!"
>
> Hope that everyone is agree with my opinion ?

Woops! I'm very sorry about that. I was working through some
problems I was having with getting PEAR and PEAR_PackageFileManager to
generate correct package files for my C++-based extension, and I
mistakenly committed the above change thinking it was part of the PEAR
code and not the separately-maintained PEAR_PackageFileManager package.

I am very much an advocate of letting the package maintainers control
their own packages, and I apologize for not going through the proper
channels in this case.

--
Jon Parise (jon of php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)

Sponsored Links