For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > PHP PEAR Questions and Answers > December 2007 > Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: Need feedback about PEAR Coding Standard related to PHP_CodeSniffer









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: Need feedback about PEAR Coding Standard related to PHP_CodeSniffer
Chuck Burgess

2007-12-17, 7:05 pm

On Dec 17, 2007 9:04 AM, Philippe Jausions <Philippe.Jausions@11abacus.com>
wrote:

> Hi Laurent,
>
> I'd agree with Greg that @ignore should only be used to not have
> documentation included for the **end user**.
>
> I believe it is best to have **all** code in PEAR to be properly
> documented with inline phpDoc, and not use @ignore as an excuse for sloppy
> coding practice.
>
> -Philippe
>


I agree with Greg and Philippe... I had been holding off on replying
already, since you'd asked for QA and PEAR Group opinions first :)
--
CRB

Let me introduce you to my very own DMCA-protected encryption key:
BC 1B 64 4A 8D DE 49 E8 C3 7D CC EE 1A AD EE F5
(compliments of Freedom-to-Tinker http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=1155)

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com