Home > Archive > PHP PEAR Questions and Answers > April 2006 > Off: [PEAR-QA] Services_Ebay marked unmaintained
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Off: [PEAR-QA] Services_Ebay marked unmaintained
|
|
| bertrand Gugger 2006-04-01, 6:59 pm |
| Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Since there hasn't been a commit in 9 months and a new maintainer is
>actively searched I've marked the package unmaitained.
>
>Arnaud.
>
>
>
Sorry, I'm not belonging to QA.
But what are other QA menbers telling ?
--
toggg
| |
| Stephan Schmidt 2006-04-01, 6:59 pm |
| Hi,
bertrand Gugger wrote:
> Sorry, I'm not belonging to QA.
> But what are other QA menbers telling ?
I already marked it unmaintained some w s ago. Arnaud added two new
lead maintainers.
At that point, I already asked, wheter this was a good idea, see
http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3438
So I'd definitely recommend, that we remove those two new maintainers
and mark the package as unmaintained.
A complete rewrite of Services_Ebay would be necessary to make it work
with the new schema. Once I've finished the book, I'm workng on right
now, I'll approach this problem.
Stephan
| |
| bertrand Gugger 2006-04-01, 6:59 pm |
| Stephan Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bertrand Gugger wrote:
>
>
> I already marked it unmaintained some ws ago. Arnaud added two new
> lead maintainers.
>
> At that point, I already asked, wheter this was a good idea, see
> http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3438
>
> So I'd definitely recommend, that we remove those two new maintainers
> and mark the package as unmaintained.
>
> A complete rewrite of Services_Ebay would be necessary to make it work
> with the new schema. Once I've finished the book, I'm workng on right
> now, I'll approach this problem.
>
> Stephan
>
>
this is typically no QA speach
| |
| Stephan Schmidt 2006-04-01, 6:59 pm |
| Hi,
bertrand Gugger wrote:
> this is typically no QA speach
What is this supposed to mean?
Stephan
| |
| bertrand Gugger 2006-04-01, 6:59 pm |
| Stephan Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bertrand Gugger wrote:
>
>
>
> What is this supposed to mean?
>
> Stephan
>
>
>
QA does not speak about materials.
Regards
--
toggg
| |
| Justin Patrin 2006-04-02, 3:58 am |
| On 4/1/06, bertrand Gugger <bertrand@toggg.com> wrote:
> Stephan Schmidt wrote:
>
> QA does not speak about materials.
>
bertrand, what are you trying to say here? You've been very strange
about QA for some time now. Anything quality related belongs on the QA
list. Anyone who is on the QA list is part of the extended QA team,
although only the core team has QA privileges.
Stephan is talking about an unmaintained package and BC problems,
these are QA matters.
--
Justin Patrin
| |
| Arnaud Limbourg 2006-04-02, 6:59 pm |
| Stephan Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bertrand Gugger wrote:
> I already marked it unmaintained some ws ago. Arnaud added two new
> lead maintainers.
>
> At that point, I already asked, wheter this was a good idea, see
> http://beeblex.com/lists/index.php/php.pear.qa/3438
>
> So I'd definitely recommend, that we remove those two new maintainers
> and mark the package as unmaintained.
Agreed and done.
> A complete rewrite of Services_Ebay would be necessary to make it work
> with the new schema. Once I've finished the book, I'm workng on right
> now, I'll approach this problem.
It's marked unmaintained, I also added a message in the package summary.
Arnaud.
|
|
|
|
|