Home > Archive > PHP PEAR Questions and Answers > November 2006 > Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: Statistics for too long unstable packages
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: Statistics for too long unstable packages
|
|
| Christian Weiske 2006-11-13, 6:58 pm |
| Mark,
> I doubt that the last release of DB_Table was "36 years, 5 w s" ago.
That's because the package.xml doesn't specify the last release correctly.
> BTW: Did you get my mail about your Contact_Vcard documentation
> additions?
No.
--
Regards/MfG,
Christian Weiske
| |
| Mark Wiesemann 2006-11-13, 6:58 pm |
| Hi Christian,
Christian Weiske wrote:
> That's because the package.xml doesn't specify the last release correctly.
Can you please explain what's wrong?
If I could package and release the last release, how can it be wrong
then?
> No.
I've resend it.
Regards,
Mark
| |
| Christian Weiske 2006-11-13, 6:58 pm |
| Mark,
> Can you please explain what's wrong?
>
> If I could package and release the last release, how can it be wrong
> then?
I don't know what people do when releasing a package; I do change the
package.xml and put the current version into CVS.
Look at the file:
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/...xml?view=markup
Date and Time do have a question mark in them.
I've gotta say my tool inspects the package.xml and package2.xml files
in CVS, it doesn't download the last release.
--
Regards/MfG,
Christian Weiske
| |
| Mark Wiesemann 2006-11-14, 3:57 am |
| Christian Weiske wrote:
> I don't know what people do when releasing a package; I do change the
> package.xml and put the current version into CVS.
>
> Look at the file:
> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pear/...xml?view=markup
> Date and Time do have a question mark in them.
Ah sorry, didn't remember that there was a change after the last
release. And if I alter something, I reset date and time values because
I don't know the exact date for the next release. People using PFM might
don't do that because they update the XML file only directly before a
release, but I (not using PFM) like it for clarity this way.
For your statistics it is a problem, of course. A solution might be to
download the last tagged version from CVS. Don't know how expensive this
would be and whether everybody tags his releases.
Regards,
Mark
|
|
|
|
|