Home > Archive > PHP PEAR Questions and Answers > September 2005 > Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR] [ANNOUNCEMENT] HTML_Safe-1.3.5 (beta) Released.
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: [PEAR-QA] Re: [PEAR] [ANNOUNCEMENT] HTML_Safe-1.3.5 (beta) Released.
|
|
| Klaus Guenther 2005-09-03, 6:55 pm |
| On 9/3/2005 8:27 PM, Justin Patrin spake the following words:
[color=darkred]
>On 3 Sep 2005 17:42:45 -0000, PEAR Announce <pear-dev@lists.php.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>Would someome please pull this release? "First Release", "beta", and
>
>
The release has been pulled.
Evgeny and Roman, please read the versioning details at
http://pear.php.net/group/
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Rest, unfortunately, isn't updated. It's a bug.
Klaus
| |
| Klaus Guenther 2005-09-04, 7:55 am |
| On 9/3/2005 8:56 PM, Klaus Guenther spake the following words:
> On 9/3/2005 8:27 PM, Justin Patrin spake the following words:
>
>
> The release has been pulled.
>
> Evgeny and Roman, please read the versioning details at
> http://pear.php.net/group/
>
> If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
> Rest, unfortunately, isn't updated. It's a bug.
I pulled 1.0.0RC1. Regardless of the state of the external project, PEAR
requires a 0.x.x release *before* a 1.0.0 release. That allows for
issues to be ironed out. Please also make your first release an alpha
release and fix the license problem in package.xml. It looks really bad
in pearweb (the license line is truncated). Please find a solution that
will display properly in pearweb before your next release (you can
experiment using the "edit" tab on the package homepage).
Maybe we need to make this clearer to the user. We really, really need
to emphasize to new maintainers that they need to first make a 0.x.x
release first. The first release should also be an alpha release, not a
beta, regardless of stability. We currently have *very* stable
(reliable) package in PEAR that are still released as alpha due to
possible API changes. If all goes well, and tests run fine, then it
shouldn't be a problem to advance quite quickly to stable.
Best,
Klaus
|
|
|
|
|