For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > PHP PEAR Questions and Answers > August 2005 > Re: [PEAR-QA] Unmaintained packages, a first step









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: [PEAR-QA] Unmaintained packages, a first step
Clay Loveless

2005-08-09, 5:02 pm

On 8/9/05 10:47 AM Pacific Time, Arnaud Limbourg (arnaud@limbourg.com)
wrote:

> I also think it would also makes sense to add a deprecate attribute to
> the package.xml file with a free text message to the installer can say
> things like "Package deprecated, use Foo instead".


I like this idea as well, and I believe that Greg has it in the works
already. Chiara_PEAR_Server (which I believe is intended to go into use on
pear.php.net someday) has the capability to tag packages as deprecated. So,
whether or not it's part of package.xml 2.0 or a feature of the server
mechanism instead, I believe this functionality is planned for the future
already.

-Clay

--
Killersoft.com
Arnaud Limbourg

2005-08-09, 5:02 pm

>>I also think it would also makes sense to add a deprecate attribute to
>
>
> I like this idea as well, and I believe that Greg has it in the works
> already. Chiara_PEAR_Server (which I believe is intended to go into use on
> pear.php.net someday) has the capability to tag packages as deprecated. So,
> whether or not it's part of package.xml 2.0 or a feature of the server
> mechanism instead, I believe this functionality is planned for the future
> already.


Ah, didn't know that, it's great then !

Arnaud.
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com