Home > Archive > PHP PEAR Questions and Answers > January 2005 > Re: [PEAR-QA] lead on PEAR_Frontend_Web
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: [PEAR-QA] lead on PEAR_Frontend_Web
|
|
| Alan Knowles 2005-01-01, 3:56 am |
| I've no idea if anyone ever uses PEAR_Frontend_Gtk , however it makes a
nice demostration application, so it would be good if it still worked
with 1.4.0
Regards
Alan
Greg Beaver wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will need to make a large number of minor changes to the web
> installer (PEAR_Frontend_Web) in order to support PEAR 1.4.0
> properly. If it is all right with Pierre-Alain, I would like to be
> lead for 1 release, and implement all the fixes needed to get things
> rolling.
>
> Alan, is there good reason to work on PEAR_Frontend_Gtk also?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
>
| |
| Greg Beaver 2005-01-01, 3:56 am |
| Alan Knowles wrote:
> I've no idea if anyone ever uses PEAR_Frontend_Gtk , however it makes
> a nice demostration application, so it would be good if it still
> worked with 1.4.0
>
> Regards
> Alan
OK. Would you mind taking some time away from other projects to help
get it working with PEAR 1.4.0? I think it is probably acceptable to
consider this a PEAR 1.4.0a2 feature. The real question is should I put
a dep for PEAR_Frontend_GTK in 1.4.0a1 that excludes all existing
versions? Otherwise we're talking unbelievable delay, probably 2 months
or more. I also need to release a version of PEAR_PackageFileManager
that is 1.4.0-compatible.
Greg
| |
| Alan Knowles 2005-01-01, 3:56 am |
| put the dep PEAR_Frontend_Gtk ge 0.....whatever the current one is..
and file a bug on the package so I get the reminders..
Regards
Alan
Greg Beaver wrote:
> Alan Knowles wrote:
>
>
>
>
> OK. Would you mind taking some time away from other projects to help
> get it working with PEAR 1.4.0? I think it is probably acceptable to
> consider this a PEAR 1.4.0a2 feature. The real question is should I
> put a dep for PEAR_Frontend_GTK in 1.4.0a1 that excludes all existing
> versions? Otherwise we're talking unbelievable delay, probably 2
> months or more. I also need to release a version of
> PEAR_PackageFileManager that is 1.4.0-compatible.
>
> Greg
|
|
|
|
|