Home > Archive > PHP Documentation > August 2007 > Re: [PHP-DOC] Splitting the phpdoc@ mailing list
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Re: [PHP-DOC] Splitting the phpdoc@ mailing list
|
|
| Hannes Magnusson 2007-08-27, 9:01 am |
| On 8/25/07, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Summary: Let's do it. However, I prefer doc-cvs@ and doc-bugs@ but
> keep phpdoc@ for historical reasons even though it would be nice to
> change it to doc@ including the cvs module name. Still thinking about
> that one... what does everyone else think?
I don't think renaming phpdoc@ to doc@ is such a good idea since the
modules are called phpdoc[-*] and physically renaming them on the cvs
server is just wrong (and will break aaaaaloooot of scripts and
checkouts and other stuff out there).
doc-cvs@ and doc-bugs@ however is fine with me.
-Hannes
| |
| Philip Olson 2007-08-28, 7:02 pm |
|
>
> I don't think renaming phpdoc@ to doc@ is such a good idea since the
> modules are called phpdoc[-*] and physically renaming them on the cvs
> server is just wrong (and will break aaaaaloooot of scripts and
> checkouts and other stuff out there).
>
> doc-cvs@ and doc-bugs@ however is fine with me.
The idea of renaming phpdoc to doc stems from being tired of the
PHPDoc versus phpdoc confusion so I couldn't help but mention it. But
it appears we may have decided on the following structure:
doc-bugs@ -- All bug activity (new)
doc-chm@ -- For the CHM versions of the manual
doc-cvs@ -- CVS commits (new)
doc-license@ -- Our license
doc-web@ -- http://doc.php.net/
php-notes@ -- All user notes go here
phpdoc@ -- Communication
So, we'd have seven mailing lists (two new) and one for each
translation. So unless people object or come up with something
better, let's set this into motion a w from now on September 4, 2007.
Regards,
Philip
|
|
|
|
|