For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > PERL Beginners > March 2006 > Re: [SPAM DETECT] Re: Combine similar patterns









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: [SPAM DETECT] Re: Combine similar patterns
Xavier Noria

2006-03-29, 7:57 am

On Mar 29, 2006, at 12:01, anand kumar wrote:

> Yes, of course the code u have sent is very helpful and thanks for =20
> that. But the problem here is that in a single file there may be =20
> various number of foot notes i.e. <f1>,<f2><f3>=85=85=85=85.so on. For =

all =20
> these the conventions are the same as told before. I am having =20
> problem in combining the relevant ones. Please help in this matter


I think we can go back to the simplification. Would you please send =20
an analogous simplified example that contains sections f1, f2, f3, =20
following the same structure as in the original data?

-- fxn


Anand Kumar

2006-03-29, 7:57 am

Hi

Please find the file as an attachment with this mail

Regards
Anand

Xavier Noria <fxn@hashref.com> wrote:
On Mar 29, 2006, at 12:01, anand kumar wrote:

> Yes, of course the code u have sent is very helpful and thanks for
> that. But the problem here is that in a single file there may be
> various number of foot notes i.e. ,………….so on. For all
> these the conventions are the same as told before. I am having
> problem in combining the relevant ones. Please help in this matter


I think we can go back to the simplification. Would you please send
an analogous simplified example that contains sections f1, f2, f3,
following the same structure as in the original data?

-- fxn



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: beginners-unsubscribe@perl.org
For additional commands, e-mail: beginners-help@perl.org






---------------------------------
Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket
Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.
Xavier Noria

2006-03-29, 7:57 am

On Mar 29, 2006, at 12:32, anand kumar wrote:

> Please find the file as an attachment with this mail


Well, that didn't look like a simplification at all. I asked for
another example with simplified notation because we already have an
idea of the actual input and because you need to provide the
*expected output* as well, which will be easier to produce and
understand that way.

-- fxn

Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2008 codecomments.com