For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines  


Home > Archive > Software Engineering > September 2006 > Re: Call for Papers: IAENG International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA 2









You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

 

Author Re: Call for Papers: IAENG International Conference on Control and Automation (ICCA 2
John Woodgate

2006-09-10, 9:59 pm

In message <Pine.OSX.4.64.0609100838480.8219@pangtzu.panda.com>, dated
Sun, 10 Sep 2006, Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU> writes[color=darkred]
>This statement by "William Young", more than anything else, is the
>earmark of quackery:
>

I quite agree; even the quearmark of hackery. Of course, it's quite
true. A classical example is Donald Glaser's paper on the bubble
chamber, which was rejected everywhere in 1952 (in one case because he
used the word 'bubblet', which wasn't in the dictionary used by the
editors of a very well-known journal) and won him a Nobel in 1960.

Of course, this was almost predicted by Shakespeare, thus proving his
appeal to occult forces in the Caledonian Play. (;-)
--
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK
Sponsored Links







Also available: Server administration forum archive | Web Design forum archive | Software forum archive | Hardware reviews archive

Copyright 2009 codecomments.com