| imecs__2007@iaeng.org 2006-09-10, 8:00 am |
| Dear Mr. =E2=80=9CDNA=E2=80=9D,
It is interesting to see some of your points about the famous
organization IEXX, like your own experience of buying the papers from
that organization. We are sorry to know that that paper is of little
value to you. Nevertheless, we do not think that the value of a paper
can be judged by only one or two or just a few research colleagues.
There have many good examples that show us research papers that have
been judged by many colleagues in the related domain to be of little
academics value, but later the papers have turned out to be of very
high values.
We believe that, even though that paper from the famous organization
IEXX may not interest you, it may somehow be interesting to some other
researchers. In the same way, when someone has come across different
conferences, some of them may be interesting to him, while some others
may not be so interesting. Nevertheless, it may finally turn out that
there is in fact something interesting there by some other researchers
some time in the future.
Just as the conferences of the IEXX, all of our conferences have gone
through the peer-reviewing process. As you have said, there exist paper
from IEXX that you do not like personally, if we have the honour that
you have read some of the papers from our conferences, it is not
surprising that some of these papers may not be interesting to you. As
said above, different researchers have different tastes and the history
of the science advances have told us clearly that some unique papers
may take a long time before the other researchers have discovered their
values and importance. Thus, it is not fair to judge their value by
just a few researchers conclusively.
Like the conferences of other organizations, our conference committee
have consisted of active researchers of at least doctoral degree and
have good international publication records. All of our members have
explicitly agreed to serve in our conference committees before they are
listed. Together with our reviewers, we have more than two hundred
researchers to review the papers in the conference. As some other
colleagues have said, there exist some papers that have not been
reviewed by the reviewers in some of the conferences of that IEXX, it
may also happen that a few of our reviewers may not be so careful for
their reviewing duties for our conferences. If that happens and if you
have come across such a case of our organization, you are welcome to
tell us and we will check the case with that reviewer of our
conference. Nevertheless, we expect that these are not common, as most
of our conference participants have been satisfied with our hosting of
the conferences, and with the quality of the papers in our conferences.
Nothing is perfect, and we sincerely thank for your suggestions and
opinions of the different conferences. If there is anything that you
would like to tell us for further improvement, you are very welcome to
tell us. And, if there is anything that I have not written properly,
you are also welcome to tell me.
Best regards,
William Young
Assistant Secretary
IMECS 2007 Organizing Committee
Email: williamyoung{at}iaeng.org
www.iaeng.org/IMECS2007
Genome =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
> <imecs__2007@iaeng.org> wrote in message
> news:1157037644.429488.209490@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>
> So, as a matter of interest, would you be so kind as to identify which of
> the people you have listed above have been or are regular contributors to
> the newsgroups you have posted to.
>
> I'm only asking because it seems fair to assume that if you lot have run =
out
> of useful ideas and are looking for our contribution then you must have d=
one
> something for us in the past.
>
> I mean, last time I looked for something on the interwank and found a link
> through Google that led me to an IEXXXXXX site someone wanted some 50doll=
ar
> on the basis of an abstract and I can be fairly sure the information was =
not
> worth the 50dollar.
>
> Let alone the opportunity to offer my credit card details.....
>
> Oh but then you are saying that all off this information you are requesti=
ng
> will be available to the academic community through libraries and ISBN
> numbers and whatnot. Does that mean you lot have truly run out of ideas?
>
> I just had a go at finding something to download from your site. Did I mi=
ss
> something. It's just that there is nothing there. Absolutely bugger all.
> Perhaps you can provide a link for me that will let me download an
> interesting paper published by one of your members......... for no dollar.
>
> Ah, so perhaps you have no papers.........
>
> Are the people listed by you happy that you are publishing their names on
> this medium in support of your campaign? Did you ask for permission first?
> Would they drop you if they found out? Are you bothered?
>
> Do you think I should contact some of them and ask about it?
>=20
> DNA
|