Home > Archive > Software Engineering > July 2006 > software architecture
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
software architecture
|
|
| Richard 2006-07-17, 9:58 pm |
| We have just started a new group dedicated to
software architecture on Google. It is called,
software.eng.architecture
We welcome contributions on this topic.
Thanks,
Richard Riehle
| |
| Bjorn Reese 2006-07-17, 9:58 pm |
| Richard wrote:
> We have just started a new group dedicated to
> software architecture on Google. It is called,
>
> software.eng.architecture
Is there any reason why this was not been created as a proper newsgroup?
--
mail1dotstofanetdotdk
| |
| James Bond 007 2006-07-17, 9:58 pm |
|
"Bjorn Reese" <breese@see.signature> wrote in message =
news:44bbfe29$0$22901$ba624c82@nntp02.dk.telia.net...
> Richard wrote:
>=20
> Is there any reason why this was not been created as a proper =
newsgroup?
I second that comment. Please create a comp.software-eng.architecture =
if you want us to participate. I have a Google account but use it only =
for Google Talk, not for news groups. I use my regular home ISP account =
for that, and they will not recognize new groups that do not conform =
with the Usenet newsgroup naming convention.
James Bond 007
| |
|
| On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:39:16 UTC, "James Bond 007" <007@hmss.uk.gov> wrote:
>
> "Bjorn Reese" <breese@see.signature> wrote in message news:44bbfe29$0$22901$ba624c82@nntp02.dk.telia.net...
>
> I second that comment. Please create a comp.software-eng.architecture if you want us to participate. I have a Google account but use it only for Google Talk, not for news groups. I use my regular home ISP account for that, and they will not recognize
new groups that do not conform with the Usenet newsgroup naming convention.
>
> James Bond 007
I agree. Traditional newsgroups are much easier to read than web-based
portals and blogs. While I'll use Google for searching, you won't find
me using their access to groups.
David
| |
| Herbert Glarner 2006-07-18, 7:00 pm |
| The creation of a new group in the big eight (comp.*, humanities.*,
misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, and talk.*) is not at all creatable
"just so".
This is also the reason for the existence of the alt.* hierarchies et al.
Regards
//Herbert
Bjorn Reese wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>
>
>
> Is there any reason why this was not been created as a proper newsgroup?
>
--
http://herbert.wikispaces.com
| |
| Herbert Glarner 2006-07-18, 7:00 pm |
| Just realizing that this was not very constructive. Let's do it better:
Subscribe to "news.groups.questions". There you find 2 threads by Jon
Bell (July 10th and 12th). Read them in order to know how to propose new
groups.
Regards
//Herbert
Herbert Glarner wrote:
> The creation of a new group in the big eight (comp.*, humanities.*,
> misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, and talk.*) is not at all creatable
> "just so".
--
http://herbert.wikispaces.com
| |
| James Bond 007 2006-07-18, 7:00 pm |
| alt.* groups still conform to the naming convention and are picked up by =
most ISPs. A Google group software.eng.architecture will not be =
accessible to anyone except Google users.
"Herbert Glarner" <herbert.glarner@bluewin.ch> wrote in message =
news:44bcff34_6@news.bluewin.ch...
> The creation of a new group in the big eight (comp.*, humanities.*,=20
> misc.*, news.*, rec.*, sci.*, soc.*, and talk.*) is not at all =
creatable=20
> "just so".
>=20
> This is also the reason for the existence of the alt.* hierarchies et =
al.
>=20
> Regards
> //Herbert
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Bjorn Reese wrote:
newsgroup?[color=darkred]
>=20
> --=20
> http://herbert.wikispaces.com
|
|
|
|
|