Building DBD::Oracle on XP w/ VC 2005

First off, I am new to the list.  If there is a FAQ, feel free to point
me there!

This morning I built DBD-Oracle-1.21 on my XP machine using Visual
Studio 2005.  After building, I needed to copy the redistributable files
to blib/arch/auto/DBD/Oracle, and I needed to embed the manifest into
Oracle.dll with the following command:

mt.exe -manifest Oracle.dll.manifest -outputresource:Oracle.dll;2=20

I also needed to include my SID in ORACLE_USERID:

set ORACLE_USERID=3Duser/password@tns_entry/ORCL
^^^^^

After all this, things worked, *except* for two tests:

t/26exe_array...........ok 1/14
t/26exe_array...........NOK 11/14#   Failed test '... we should have 19
tuple_status'
#   at t/26exe_array.t line 120.
#          got: 10
#     expected: 19

t/26exe_array...........NOK 14/14#   Failed test '... we should have 48
rows'
#   at t/26exe_array.t line 146.
#          got: 30
#     expected: 48
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 14.
t/26exe_array...........dubious
Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)

I'm curious if others have seen these problems.

Chris

Can you point it to a different  non 11 DB instance??

and run the tests again?

Could be a bug on the oracle side?

seems to be a number of them on 11 64 dbs coming up the past few days.

cheers
John Scoles
Gerber, Christopher J wrote: 
> point
> 
> files
> 
> into
> 
> 19
> 
> 48
> 
>
> 
>
> I am using Oracle Instant Client 11.1.0.6.0 32bit on Windows to connect
> to a server running Oracle 11.1.0.6.0 64bit on Linux.  I am using DBI
> version 1.601, although I see that 1.602 is now available.
>
> 
> test.
> 
> see
> 
>
> Using the SYSTEM account I get the same test results.
>
> I just updated DBI to 1.602 and tested again... the results are the
> same.
>
> 

> Can you point it to a different  non 11 DB instance??
>=20
> and run the tests again?
>=20
> Could be a bug on the oracle side?
>=20
> seems to be a number of them on 11 64 dbs coming up the past few days.

Using an Oracle 9i server, the errors went away.  I think that you're
right about the 11g bug.  Thanks for the assistance.  I guess I have to
find someone at Oracle to pester now! :)

>=20
> cheers
> John Scoles
> Gerber, Christopher J wrote: 
 
have 
have 
this 
on? 
connect 
see=20 

I will CC this one to a contact I have at Oracle as  the first question
Oracle suport will as is what it DBD::Oracle??? followed by we don't
support it.

If you do follow up say the execute array dose not work as expected.
and that it works in 9.

cheers
John Scoles

Gerber, Christopher J wrote: 
>
> Using an Oracle 9i server, the errors went away.  I think that you're
> right about the 11g bug.  Thanks for the assistance.  I guess I have to
> find someone at Oracle to pester now! :)
>
> 
>
> 
> have
> 
> have
> 
> this
> 
> on?
> 
> connect
> 
> see
> 

Seem I now have access to an Oracle 11 box so I can have a look into this.

So far I get the same results as you.

Tomorrow I will have to do some debugging with this.

Cheers John Scoles

John Scoles wrote:
> I will CC this one to a contact I have at Oracle as  the first
> question Oracle suport will as is what it DBD::Oracle??? followed by
> we don't support it.
>
> If you do follow up say the execute array dose not work as expected.
> and that it works in 9.
>
> cheers
> John Scoles
>
> Gerber, Christopher J wrote: