Code Comments

Programming Forum and web based access to our favorite programming groups.
For Programmers: Free Programming Magazines | New: Database administration forum
Registration is free! Edit your profileCalendarFind other membersFrequently Asked QuestionsSearch -> 
Post New Thread











Thread
Author

M-I'5-Pe rsecution - wh y the security ser vices?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= why the security. services? -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

You may ask, why do I think the. "they" referred to are the security
services? Is there any evidence that there is. a single source, as opposed
to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if. there
is a single. source, is there any evidence that "they" are professional
"buggers". as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
funded. organization?

a) As to the question of a single source. versus something more fragmented;
it is quite obvious that there. is a single source from the way the campaign
has been carried out. Since. things have been repeated verbatim which were
said in my home,. there must be one group which does the watching and
listening. Since on several. occasions (mainly during travel) people have
been planted in close proximity and rehearsed in what. they were to say, it
follows that someone. must have done the planning for that, and again a
single source is. indicated.

b). So why couldn't it be amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private
organisation, for example a private detective agency paid to manage. the
campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective. agencies are
unscrupulous as has been. proved on the occasions in the past when they've
been. exposed or caught; they too can have access to the bugging technology
deployed; and there are reported cases of MI5 paying private. eyes to do
their dirty work (against peace. campaigners and similar enemies of the
state) on the understanding that if they were caught then they could. deny
all knowledge.. Why couldn't that be the case?

The main factor pointing to direct security service involvement (as. opposed
to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of. their access to the media in
particular,. and the fact that the television companies are so involved in
the. campaign. The BBC would not directly invade someone's home themselves,
since it would not be within. their remit to allocate personnel or financial
resources to do so. An organisation of their stature would. not take part in
a campaign set up. by private sources. The only people they would take
material from would be the. security services, presumably on the assumption
that if the cat ever flew. out of the bag yowling it would be MI5 who would
take. the consequences.

State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is. also
indicated by duration; support. for over six years for a team of three or
four people would be beyond the means and will of. most private sources.
The viciousness of the slanders. and personal denigration also points to
MI5; they. traditionally "protect" the British state from politicians of the
wrong hue by character assassination, and in. this case are using their
tried and tested methods to murder with words an enemy. they have invented
for. themselves.

And there are precedents.. Diana and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed
"at it" by an Army intelligence team. which had operated in Northern
Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called. Jones who had been
on the team. His statements were denied by the. defence establishment who
tried to character-assassinate by describing him. as the "Jones twins".
Funny how if you tell the truth, then you. must be ill, isn't it? Thought
only communists. behaved like that?

Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to by someone in the army. who
revealed the existence of videotapes of him and Diana, and that the. tapes
would be published if any. attempt was made by them to resume their
association.

337


Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
fmfem@yahoo.com
01-02-08 12:58 PM



Shania Twain and Pamela Anderson In Pussy Cucumber!
http://www.thetubebender.com/PlayFile?clip=726071

Paris Hilton and Christina Applegate , Petting Slits!
http://www.thetubebender.com/player.wmv?q=726071

Jessica Alba and Shania Twain ,Insert Bottly In XXXXXXX!
http://www.thetubebender.com/Play?watch=726071

Hilary Duff and Jennifer Aniston Crazy On High Heels!
http://www.thetubebender.com/MediaP...mv?watch=726071

Halle Berry and Christina Aguilera Go Lesbian!
http://www.thetubebender.com/Play?q=726071

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Enceder
01-20-08 11:22 AM



Jessica Simpson extreme masturbation!
[url]http://www.BestGBlog.com/MediaPlayer?watch=726071[/url]

Halle Berry Cumshot MPGS!
[url]http://www.BestGBlog.com/Play?vid=726071[/url]

Halle Berry In Ping Teases In Her Panties!
[url]http://www.BestGBlog.com/WatchTube?watch=726071[/url]

Jessica Simpson Stripteasing & Spreading Snatch!
[url]http://www.BestGBlog.com/d?movie=726071[/url]

Christina Aguilera , Beef Humping Studs!
[url]http://www.BestGBlog.com/player.php?movie=726071[/url]

Report this thread to moderator Post Follow-up to this message
Old Post
Poted
03-18-08 05:08 PM


Sponsored Links




Last Thread Next Thread Next
Search this forum -> 
Post New Thread

ASM370 archive

Show a Printable Version Send to friend Email This Page to Someone! subscribe to this thread Receive updates to this thread
Computer Consultants
Programming Jobs
Visual Basic Controls
SQL Server Programming
Webservices
Java Security
Visual Studio
C# Programming
Visual J++
Software engineering
Open source Software
Perl Programming
PHP Programming
ASP Programming
ASP .NET Programming
Visual Basic Programming
Windows Scripting Host
Java Programming
Java Help
Java Beans
VBScript
Cobol
MAC Applications
Unix Programming
Forum Jump:
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 PM.

 
Free MCSE Braindumps | Real Estate Topics

Programming forum archive

Copyrights CodeComments.com 2004 - 2006

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2006 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.